Category: Bibliography

See: Programming in Scala Fifth Edition, by Martin Odersky, Publisher ‏ : ‎ Artima Press; 5th edition (June 15, 2021)

Fair Use Source:

• Kindle: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B097KT5XNK
• Printed Book: https://smile.amazon.com/Programming-Scala-Fifth-Odersky/dp/0997148004

This book is the authoritative tutorial on the Scala programming language, co-written by the language’s designer, Martin Odersky. This fifth edition is a major rewrite of the entire book, adding new material to cover the many changes in Scala 3.0. In fact we have added so much new material that we split the book into two volumes. This volume is a tutorial of Scala and functional programming.

Praise for the earlier editions of Programming in Scala

Programming in Scala is probably one of the best programming books I’ve ever read. I like the writing style, the brevity, and the thorough explanations. The book seems to answer every question as it enters my mind—it’s always one step ahead of me. The authors don’t just give you some code and take things for granted. They give you the meat so you really understand what’s going on. I really like that.

• Ken Egervari, Chief Software Architect

Programming in Scala is clearly written, thorough, and easy to follow. It has great examples and useful tips throughout. It has enabled our organization to ramp up on the Scala language quickly and efficiently. This book is great for any programmer who is trying to wrap their head around the flexibility and elegance of the Scala language.

• Larry Morroni, Owner, Morroni Technologies, Inc.

The Programming in Scala book serves as an excellent tutorial to the Scala language. Working through the book, it flows well with each chapter building on concepts and examples described in earlier ones. The book takes care to explain the language constructs in depth, often providing examples of how the language differs from Java. As well as the main language, there is also some coverage of libraries such as containers and actors.

I have found the book really easy to work through, and it is probably one of the better written technical books I have read recently. I really would recommend this book to any programmer wanting to find out more about the Scala language.

• Matthew Todd

I am amazed by the effort undertaken by the authors of Programming in Scala. This book is an invaluable guide to what I like to call Scala the Platform: a vehicle to better coding, a constant inspiration for scalable software design and implementation. If only I had Scala in its present mature state and this book on my desk back in 2003, when co-designing and implementing parts of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games Portal infrastructure!

To all readers: No matter what your programming background is, I feel you will find programming in Scala liberating and this book will be a loyal friend in the journey.

• Christos KK Loverdos, Software Consultant, Researcher

Programming in Scala is a superb in-depth introduction to Scala, and it’s also an excellent reference. I’d say that it occupies a prominent place on my bookshelf, except that I’m still carrying it around with me nearly everywhere I go.

• Brian Clapper, President, ArdenTex, Inc.

Great book, well written with thoughtful examples. I would recommend it to both seasoned programmers and newbies.

• Howard Lovatt

The book Programming in Scala is not only about how, but more importantly, why to develop programs in this new programming language. The book’s pragmatic approach in introducing the power of combining object-oriented and functional programming leaves the reader without any doubts as to what Scala really is.

• Dr. Ervin Varga, CEO/founder, EXPRO I.T. Consulting

This is a great introduction to functional programming for OO programmers. Learning about FP was my main goal, but I also got acquainted with some nice Scala surprises like case classes and pattern matching. Scala is an intriguing language and this book covers it well.

There’s always a fine line to walk in a language introduction book between giving too much or not enough information. I find Programming in Scala to achieve a perfect balance.

• Jeff Heon, Programmer Analyst

I bought an early electronic version of the Programming in Scala book, by Odersky, Spoon, and Venners, and I was immediately a fan. In addition to the fact that it contains the most comprehensive information about the language, there are a few key features of the electronic format that impressed me. I have never seen links used as well in a PDF, not just for bookmarks, but also providing active links from the table of contents and index. I don’t know why more authors don’t use this feature, because it’s really a joy for the reader. Another feature which I was impressed with was links to the forums (“Discuss”) and a way to send comments (“Suggest”) to the authors via email. The comments feature by itself isn’t all that uncommon, but the simple inclusion of a page number in what is generated to send to the authors is valuable for both the authors and readers. I contributed more comments than I would have if the process would have been more arduous.

Read Programming in Scala for the content, but if you’re reading the electronic version, definitely take advantage of the digital features that the authors took the care to build in!

• Dianne Marsh, Founder/Software Consultant, SRT Solutions

Lucidity and technical completeness are hallmarks of any well-written book, and I congratulate Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon, and Bill Venners on a job indeed very well done! The Programming in Scala book starts by setting a strong foundation with the basic concepts and ramps up the user to an intermediate level & beyond. This book is certainly a must buy for anyone aspiring to learn Scala.

• Jagan Nambi, Enterprise Architecture, GMAC Financial Services

Programming in Scala is a pleasure to read. This is one of those well-written technical books that provide deep and comprehensive coverage of the subject in an exceptionally concise and elegant manner.

The book is organized in a very natural and logical way. It is equally well suited for a curious technologist who just wants to stay on top of the current trends and a professional seeking deep understanding of the language core features and its design rationales. I highly recommend it to all interested in functional programming in general. For Scala developers, this book is unconditionally a must-read.

• Igor Khlystov, Software Architect/Lead Programmer, Greystone Inc.

The book Programming in Scala outright oozes the huge amount of hard work that has gone into it. I’ve never read a tutorial-style book before that accomplishes to be introductory yet comprehensive: in their (misguided) attempt to be approachable and not “confuse” the reader, most tutorials silently ignore aspects of a subject that are too advanced for the current discussion. This leaves a very bad taste, as one can never be sure as to the understanding one has achieved. There is always some residual “magic” that hasn’t been explained and cannot be judged at all by the reader. This book never does that, it never takes anything for granted: every detail is either sufficiently explained or a reference to a later explanation is given. Indeed, the text is extensively cross-referenced and indexed, so that forming a complete picture of a complex topic is relatively easy.

• Gerald Loeffler, Enterprise Java Architect

Programming in Scala by Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon, and Bill Venners: in times where good programming books are rare, this excellent introduction for intermediate programmers really stands out. You’ll find everything here you need to learn this promising language.

• Christian Neukirchen

---

Programming in Scala, Fifth Edition

Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon, Bill Venners, and Frank Sommers

Artima Press, Walnut Creek, California

Martin Odersky is the creator of the Scala language and a professor at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland. Lex Spoon worked on Scala for two years as a post-doc with Martin Odersky. Bill Venners is president of Artima, Inc. Frank Sommers is president of Autospaces, Inc.

Artima Press is an imprint of Artima, Inc.

2070 N Broadway Unit 305, Walnut Creek, California 94597

Copyright © 2007-2021 Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon, Bill Venners, and Frank Sommers. All rights reserved.

First edition published as PrePrint™ eBook 2007

First edition published 2008

Second edition published 2010

Third edition published 2016

Fourth edition published 2019

Fifth edition published as PrePrint™ eBook 2021

Build date of this impression July 12, 2021

Produced in the United States of America

No part of this publication may be reproduced, modified, distributed, stored in a retrieval system, republished, displayed, or performed, for commercial or noncommercial purposes or for compensation of any kind without prior written permission from Artima, Inc.

All information and materials in this book are provided “as is” and without warranty of any kind.

The term “Artima” and the Artima logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Artima, Inc. All other company and/or product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their owners.

to Nastaran – M.O.

to Fay – L.S.

to Siew – B.V.

to Jungwon – F.S.

—-

Table of Contents

Foreword

Acknowledgments

Introduction

1. A Scalable Language
2. First Steps in Scala
3. Next Steps in Scala
4. Classes and Objects
5. Basic Types and Operations
6. Functional Objects
7. Built-in Control Structures
8. Functions and Closures
9. Control Abstraction
10. Composition and Inheritance
11. Traits
12. Packages, Imports, and Exports
13. Pattern Matching
14. Working with Lists
15. Working with Other Collections
16. Mutable Objects
17. Scala’s Hierarchy
18. Type Parameterization
19. Enums
20. Abstract Members
21. Givens
22. Extension Methods
23. Typeclasses
24. Collections in Depth
25. Assertions and Tests

Glossary

Bibliography

About the Authors

Index

Foreword

Watching the birth of a new programming language is a funny thing. To anyone who uses a programming language—whether you are dabbling with programming for the first time or are a grizzled career software engineer—programming languages just seem to exist. Like a hammer or axe, a programming language is a tool, already there, that enables us to perform our trade. We seldom think of how that tool came to be, what the process was to design it. We might have opinions about its design, but beyond that, we usually just put up with it and push forward.

Being there as a programming language is created, however, brings a totally different perspective. The possibilities for what could be seem endless. Yet at the same time, the programming language must satisfy what seems like an infinite list of constraints. It’s an odd tension.

New programming languages are created for many reasons: a personal desire to scratch a niggling itch, a profound academic insight, technical debt, or the benefit of hindsight of other compiler architectures—even politics. Scala 3 is a combination of some of these.

Whatever combination it may be, it all started when Martin Odersky disappeared one day, emerging a few days later to announce in a research group meeting that he had begun experimenting with bringing the DOT calculus to life by writing a new compiler from scratch.[1] Here we were, a group of PhD students and postdocs who had until recently been a big part of the development and maintenance of Scala 2. At the time, Scala was reaching what felt like unfathomable heights of success, especially for an esoteric and academic programming language from a school with a funny-sounding name in Switzerland. Scala had recently taken off among startups in the Bay Area, and Typesafe, later named Lightbend, had recently been formed to support, maintain, and manage releases of Scala 2. So why all of a sudden a new compiler and possibly a new and different programming language? Most were skeptical. Martin was undeterred.

Months passed. Like clockwork, at twelve noon every day, the entire lab would gather in the hallway connecting all of our offices. After a fair number of us and Martin had assembled, we’d venture together to one of EPFL’s many cafeterias, grab lunch, and later, an after-lunch coffee. Each day during this ritual, ideas for this new compiler were a recurrent theme. Discussions would ping pong about, anywhere from focusing on something “150%” compatible with Scala 2 (to avoid a Python 2 versus Python 3 debacle), to creating new language with full-spectrum dependent types.

One by one, the skeptics in the research group seemed to become sold by some appealing aspect of Scala 3, be it streamlining the implementation of the typechecker, the brand new compiler architecture, or the powerful additions to the type system. Over time, much of the community also came around to the idea of Scala 3 being a marked improvement over Scala 2. Different people had different reasons for this. For some, it was the improvements in readability via the decision to make braces and parentheses around conditions in conditionals optional. For others, it was improvements to the type system; for example, match types for improved type-level programming. The list went on.

Rather than blindly steaming ahead on the design of Scala 3 based on hunch alone, I can confidently assert that Scala 3 is the result of much learning from design decisions of the past, and years of conversation with the EPFL research group and the Scala community. And there was no way but to start from a clean slate, and build on clean foundations. With this from-scratch approach, what emerged is, at its core, a new programming language.

Scala 3 is a new programming language. Sure, it might be compatible with Scala 2, and it might sound like the third major release of an already-existing programming language. But don’t let that fool you. Scala 3 represents a substantial streamlining of many of the experimental ideas pioneered in Scala 2.

Perhaps what is most uniquely “Scala” about Scala 3 is what happened to implicits. Scala, since its inception, has been used by clever programmers to achieve functionality that few thought was even possible given Scala’s feature set, let alone something Scala was designed for. The feature previously-known as implicits is perhaps the most well-known feature of Scala that has been exploited to bend Scala 2 in unexpected ways. Example use cases of implicits include retroactively adding a method to a class, without extending and re-compiling that class. Or, given a type signature used in some context, automatically selecting the right implementation for that context. This is just the tip of the iceberg—we even wrote a research paper attempting to catalog the multitude of ways in which developers have used implicits.[2]

This is like providing a user with knobs and levers and leaving it to them to build a smoothly-functioning piece of machinery, like the mechanical calculator shown in Figure 2.0. But often, what comes out instead is something that looks more like a kinetic sculpture of Theo Jansen, such as the one shown in Figure 2.0, than anything with an obvious use.[3] Simply put, you give a programming community something as basic as a lever and a knob, and the intrepid will seek to find creative ways to use it. It’s human nature. But perhaps here, Scala 2’s mistake was the idea to provide something as general-purpose as something like knobs and levers in the first place.

What was intended.

What we got.

The point here is that in Scala 2, there was this endless array of possibilities for what implicits could be used for, which necessitated an entire research paper, and which the community generally couldn’t agree upon how to sanely use. No language feature should have such a murky purpose for being. And yet, here they were—implicits were seen by many as the unique and powerful feature of Scala that essentially no other language had, and by many others as a mysterious and often frustrating mechanism that would invasively rewrite code that you had written to be something else.

You may have heard the oft-repeated mantra that in many ways, Scala 3 represents a simplification of the Scala that came before it. The story of implicits is an excellent example. Cognizant of the back flips programmers were doing with implicits in an attempt to realize broader programming patterns like typeclass derivation, Martin, with the help of many others, came to the conclusion that we should not focus on implicits as a mechanism for people to use in the most general case. Rather, we should focus on what programmers want to do with implicits, and make that easier and more performant. This is where the mantra, “Scala 3 focuses on intent rather than mechanism,” comes from.

With Scala 3, rather than focus on the generality of implicits as a mechanism, the decision was made to focus on specific use-cases that developers had in mind when choosing to use implicits in the first place, and to make these patterns more direct to use. Examples include passing context or configuration information to methods implicitly, without the programmer having to explicitly thread through repetitive arguments; retroactively adding methods to classes; and converting between types, like Ints and Doubles during arithmetic. Now, Scala 3 makes these use cases available to programmers without needing to understand some “deep” intuition about how the Scala compiler resolves implicits. You can instead just focus on tasks like “add a method foo to class Bar without having to recompile it.” No PhD required. Just replace the previous notion of “implicit” with other more direct keywords that correspond to specific use cases, such as given and using. See Chapters 21 and 22 for more on this.

This story of “prioritizing intent over mechanism” doesn’t stop at the revamping of implicits. Rather, the philosophy goes on to touch upon most every aspect of the language. Examples include additions and streamlining of many aspects of Scala’s type system, from union types, to enums, to match types—or even the cleanups to Scala’s syntax: optional braces to improve readability, and more readable “quiet” syntax for ifs, elses, and whiles, resulting in conditionals that look much more English-like.

Don’t take my word for it. Whether you’re a newcomer to Scala, or an experienced Scala developer, I hope you find many of the new design ideas that have entered Scala 3 to be as refreshing and straightforward as I do!

Heather Miller

Lausanne, Switzerland

June 1, 2021

---

Footnotes:

[1] DOT, or dependent object types, calculus is a series of formalizations attempting to characterize the essence of Scala’s type system.

[2] Krikava, et. al., Scala implicits are everywhere. [Kri19]

[3] For a more dynamic depiction of the kinetic sculptures of Theo Jansen, which are collectively entitled Strandbeest, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LewVEF2B_pM.

Acknowledgments

Many people have contributed to this book and to the material it covers. We are grateful to all of them.

Scala itself has been a collective effort of many people. The design and the implementation of version 1.0 was helped by Philippe Altherr, Vincent Cremet, Gilles Dubochet, Burak Emir, Stéphane Micheloud, Nikolay Mihaylov, Michel Schinz, Erik Stenman, and Matthias Zenger. Phil Bagwell, Antonio Cunei, Iulian Dragos, Gilles Dubochet, Miguel Garcia, Philipp Haller, Sean McDirmid, Ingo Maier, Donna Malayeri, Adriaan Moors, Hubert Plociniczak, Paul Phillips, Aleksandar Prokopec, Tiark Rompf, Lukas Rytz, and Geoffrey Washburn joined in the effort to develop the second and current version of the language and tools.

Gilad Bracha, Nathan Bronson, Caoyuan, Aemon Cannon, Craig Chambers, Chris Conrad, Erik Ernst, Matthias Felleisen, Mark Harrah, Shriram Krishnamurti, Gary Leavens, David MacIver, Sebastian Maneth, Rickard Nilsson, Erik Meijer, Lalit Pant, David Pollak, Jon Pretty, Klaus Ostermann, Jorge Ortiz, Didier Rémy, Miles Sabin, Vijay Saraswat, Daniel Spiewak, James Strachan, Don Syme, Erik Torreborre, Mads Torgersen, Philip Wadler, Jamie Webb, John Williams, Kevin Wright, and Jason Zaugg have shaped the design of the language by graciously sharing their ideas with us in lively and inspiring discussions, by contributing important pieces of code to the open source effort, as well as through comments on previous versions of this document. The contributors to the Scala mailing list have also given very useful feedback that helped us improve the language and its tools.

George Berger has worked tremendously to make the build process and the web presence for the book work smoothly. As a result this project has been delightfully free of technical snafus.

Many people gave us valuable feedback on early versions of the text. Thanks goes to Eric Armstrong, George Berger, Alex Blewitt, Gilad Bracha, William Cook, Bruce Eckel, Stéphane Micheloud, Todd Millstein, David Pollak, Frank Sommers, Philip Wadler, and Matthias Zenger. Thanks also to the Silicon Valley Patterns group for their very helpful review: Dave Astels, Tracy Bialik, John Brewer, Andrew Chase, Bradford Cross, Raoul Duke, John P. Eurich, Steven Ganz, Phil Goodwin, Ralph Jocham, Yan-Fa Li, Tao Ma, Jeffery Miller, Suresh Pai, Russ Rufer, Dave W. Smith, Scott Turnquest, Walter Vannini, Darlene Wallach, and Jonathan Andrew Wolter. And we’d like to thank Dewayne Johnson and Kim Leedy for their help with the cover art, and Frank Sommers for his work on the index.

We’d also like to extend a special thanks to all of our readers who contributed comments. Your comments were very helpful to us in shaping this into an even better book. We couldn’t print the names of everyone who contributed comments, but here are the names of readers who submitted at least five comments during the eBook PrePrint™ stage by clicking on the Suggest link, sorted first by the highest total number of comments submitted, then alphabetically. Thanks goes to: David Biesack, Donn Stephan, Mats Henricson, Rob Dickens, Blair Zajac, Tony Sloane, Nigel Harrison, Javier Diaz Soto, William Heelan, Justin Forder, Gregor Purdy, Colin Perkins, Bjarte S. Karlsen, Ervin Varga, Eric Willigers, Mark Hayes, Martin Elwin, Calum MacLean, Jonathan Wolter, Les Pruszynski, Seth Tisue, Andrei Formiga, Dmitry Grigoriev, George Berger, Howard Lovatt, John P. Eurich, Marius Scurtescu, Jeff Ervin, Jamie Webb, Kurt Zoglmann, Dean Wampler, Nikolaj Lindberg, Peter McLain, Arkadiusz Stryjski, Shanky Surana, Craig Bordelon, Alexandre Patry, Filip Moens, Fred Janon, Jeff Heon, Boris Lorbeer, Jim Menard, Tim Azzopardi, Thomas Jung, Walter Chang, Jeroen Dijkmeijer, Casey Bowman, Martin Smith, Richard Dallaway, Antony Stubbs, Lars Westergren, Maarten Hazewinkel, Matt Russell, Remigiusz Michalowski, Andrew Tolopko, Curtis Stanford, Joshua Cough, Zemian Deng, Christopher Rodrigues Macias, Juan Miguel Garcia Lopez, Michel Schinz, Peter Moore, Randolph Kahle, Vladimir Kelman, Daniel Gronau, Dirk Detering, Hiroaki Nakamura, Ole Hougaard, Bhaskar Maddala, David Bernard, Derek Mahar, George Kollias, Kristian Nordal, Normen Mueller, Rafael Ferreira, Binil Thomas, John Nilsson, Jorge Ortiz, Marcus Schulte, Vadim Gerassimov, Cameron Taggart, Jon-Anders Teigen, Silvestre Zabala, Will McQueen, and Sam Owen.

We would also like to thank those who submitted comments and errata after the first two editions were published, including Felix Siegrist, Lothar Meyer-Lerbs, Diethard Michaelis, Roshan Dawrani, Donn Stephan, William Uther, Francisco Reverbel, Jim Balter, and Freek de Bruijn, Ambrose Laing, Sekhar Prabhala, Levon Saldamli, Andrew Bursavich, Hjalmar Peters, Thomas Fehr, Alain O’Dea, Rob Dickens, Tim Taylor, Christian Sternagel, Michel Parisien, Joel Neely, Brian McKeon, Thomas Fehr, Joseph Elliott, Gabriel da Silva Ribeiro, Thomas Fehr, Pablo Ripolles, Douglas Gaylor, Kevin Squire, Harry-Anton Talvik, Christopher Simpkins, Martin Witmann-Funk, Jim Balter, Peter Foster, Craig Bordelon, Heinz-Peter Gumm, Peter Chapin, Kevin Wright, Ananthan Srinivasan, Omar Kilani, Donn Stephan, Guenther Waffler.

Lex would like to thank Aaron Abrams, Jason Adams, Henry and Emily Crutcher, Joey Gibson, Gunnar Hillert, Matthew Link, Toby Reyelts, Jason Snape, John and Melinda Weathers, and all of the Atlanta Scala Enthusiasts for many helpful discussions about the language design, its mathematical underpinnings, and how to present Scala to working engineers.

A special thanks to Dave Briccetti and Adriaan Moors for reviewing the third edition, and to Marconi Lanna for not only reviewing, but providing motivation for the third edition by giving a talk entitled “What’s new since Programming in Scala.”

Bill would like to thank Gary Cornell, Greg Doench, Andy Hunt, Mike Leonard, Tyler Ortman, Bill Pollock, Dave Thomas, and Adam Wright for providing insight and advice on book publishing. Bill would also like to thank Dick Wall for collaborating on our Stairway to Scala course, which is in great part based on this book. Our many years of experience teaching Stairway to Scala helped make this book better. Lastly, Bill would like to thank Darlene Gruendl and Samantha Woolf for their help in getting the third edition completed.

Finally, we would like to thank Julien Richard-Foy for his work to bring the fourth edition of this book up to date with Scala 2.13, in particular the new collections redesign.

Introduction

This book is a tutorial for the Scala programming language, written by people directly involved in the development of Scala. Our goal is that by reading this book, you can learn everything you need to be a productive Scala programmer. All examples in this book compile with Scala version 3.0.0.

Who should read this book

The main target audience for this book is programmers who want to learn to program in Scala. If you want to do your next software project in Scala, then this is the book for you. In addition, the book should be interesting to programmers wishing to expand their horizons by learning new concepts. If you’re a Java programmer, for example, reading this book will expose you to many concepts from functional programming as well as advanced object-oriented ideas. We believe learning about Scala, and the ideas behind it, can help you become a better programmer in general.

General programming knowledge is assumed. While Scala is a fine first programming language, this is not the book to use to learn programming.

On the other hand, no specific knowledge of programming languages is required. Even though most people use Scala on the Java platform, this book does not presume you know anything about Java. However, we expect many readers to be familiar with Java, and so we sometimes compare Scala to Java to help such readers understand the differences.

How to use this book

Because the main purpose of this book is to serve as a tutorial, the recommended way to read this book is in chapter order, from front to back. We have tried hard to introduce one topic at a time, and explain new topics only in terms of topics we’ve already introduced. Thus, if you skip to the back to get an early peek at something, you may find it explained in terms of concepts you don’t quite understand. To the extent you read the chapters in order, we think you’ll find it quite straightforward to gain competency in Scala, one step at a time.

If you see a term you do not know, be sure to check the glossary and the index. Many readers will skim parts of the book, and that is just fine. The glossary and index can help you backtrack whenever you skim over something too quickly.

After you have read the book once, it should also serve as a language reference. There is a formal specification of the Scala language, but the language specification tries for precision at the expense of readability. Although this book doesn’t cover every detail of Scala, it is quite comprehensive and should serve as an approachable language reference as you become more adept at programming in Scala.

Bibliography:

Bibliography

[Ray99] Raymond, Eric. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly, 1999.

[Blo08] Bloch, Joshua. Effective Java Second Edition. Addison-Wesley, 2008.

[Bay72] Bayer, Rudolf. Symmetric binary B-Trees: Data structure and maintenance algorithms. Acta Informatica, 1(4):290–306, 1972.

[Mor68] Morrison, Donald R. PATRICIA—Practical Algorithm To Retrieve Information Coded in Alphanumeric. J. ACM, 15(4):514–534, 1968. ISSN 0004-5411. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321479.321481. [ DOI ]

[DeR75] DeRemer, Frank and Hans Kron. Programming-in-the large versus programming-in-the-small. In Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software, pages 114–121. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1975. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800027.808431. [ DOI ]

[SPJ02] Simon Peyton Jones, et.al. Haskell 98 Language and Libraries, Revised Report. Technical report, http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport, 2002.

[Vaz07] Vaziri, Mandana, Frank Tip, Stephen Fink, and Julian Dolby. Declarative Object Identity Using Relation Types. In Proc. ECOOP 2007, pages 54–78. 2007.

[Mey91] Meyers, Scott. Effective C++. Addison-Wesley, 1991.

[Rum04] Rumbaugh, James, Ivar Jacobson, and Grady Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual (2nd Edition). Addison-Wesley, 2004.

[Goe06] Goetz, Brian, Tim Peierls, Joshua Bloch, Joseph Bowbeer, David Homes, and Doug Lea. Java Concurrency in Practice. Addison Wesley, 2006.

[Mey00] Meyer, Bertrand. Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall, 2000.

[Eck98] Eckel, Bruce. Thinking in Java. Prentice Hall, 1998.

[Eva03] Evans, Eric. Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003.

[Aho86] Aho, Alfred V., Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1986. ISBN 0-201-10088-6.

[Abe96] Abelson, Harold and Gerald Jay Sussman. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. The MIT Press, second edition, 1996.

[Ode03] Odersky, Martin, Vincent Cremet, Christine Röckl, and Matthias Zenger. A Nominal Theory of Objects with Dependent Types. In Proc. ECOOP’03, Springer LNCS, pages 201–225. July 2003.

[Ode11] Odersky, Martin. The Scala Language Specification, Version 2.9. EPFL, May 2011. Available on the web at http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/manuals.html (accessed April 20, 2014).

[Ode05] Odersky, Martin and Matthias Zenger. Scalable Component Abstractions. In Proceedings of OOPSLA, pages 41–58. October 2005.

[Emi07] Emir, Burak, Martin Odersky, and John Williams. Matching Objects With Patterns. In Proc. ECOOP, Springer LNCS, pages 273–295. July 2007.

[Ste99] Steele, Jr., Guy L. Growing a Language. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 12:221–223, 1999. Transcript of a talk given at OOPSLA 1998.

[Str00] Strachey, Christopher. Fundamental Concepts in Programming Languages. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 13:11–49, 2000.

[Kay96] Kay, Alan C. The Early History of Smalltalk. In History of programming languages—II, pages 511–598. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1996. ISBN 0-201-89502-1. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/234286.1057828. [ DOI ]

[Jav] The Java Tutorials: Creating a GUI with JFC/Swing. Available on the web at http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing.

[Lan66] Landin, Peter J. The Next 700 Programming Languages. Communications of the ACM, 9(3):157–166, 1966.

[Fow04] Fowler, Martin. Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern. January 2004. Available on the web at http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html (accesssed August 6, 2008).

[Gam95] Gamma, Erich, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. Design Patterns : Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1995.

[Kay03] Kay, Alan C. An email to Stefan Ram on the meaning of the term “object-oriented programming”, July 2003. The email is published on the web at http://www.purl.org/stefan_ram/pub/doc_kay_oop_en (accesssed June 6, 2008).

[Dij70] Dijkstra, Edsger W. Notes on Structured Programming., April 1970. Circulated privately. Available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu /users/EWD/ewd02xx/EWD249.PDF as EWD249 (accessed June 6, 2008).

[Ste15] Steindorfer, Michael J and Jurgen J Vinju. Optimizing hash-array mapped tries for fast and lean immutable JVM collections. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 50, pages 783–800. ACM, 2015.

[Kri19] Krikava, Filip, Heather Miller, and Jan Vitek. Scala implicits are everywhere: a large-scale study of the use of Scala implicits in the wild. In Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, volume 3. ACM, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360589. [ DOI ]

About the Authors

Martin Odersky is the creator of the Scala language. He is a professor at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland, where since 2001 he has led the team that developed the Scala language libraries, and compiler. He is a founder of Lightbend, Inc. Lex Spoon worked on Scala for two years at EPFL and is now a software engineer at Square, Inc. Bill Venners is president of Artima, Inc. He is a community representative on the Scala Center Advisory Board, and the designer of ScalaTest. Frank Sommers is president of Autospaces, Inc.

Martin works on programming languages and systems, more specifically on the topic of how to combine object-oriented and functional programming. Since 2001 he has concentrated on designing, implementing, and refining Scala. Previously, he has influenced the development of Java as a co-designer of Java generics and as the original author of the current javac reference compiler. He is a fellow of the ACM.

Lex Spoon is a software engineer at Square, Inc., which provides easy to use business software and mobile payments. In addition to Scala, he has helped develop a wide variety of programming languages, including the dynamic language Smalltalk, the scientific language X10, and the logic language CodeQL.

Bill Venners is president of Artima, Inc., publisher of the Artima website (www.artima.com) and provider of Scala consulting, training, books, and tools. He is author of the book, Inside the Java Virtual Machine, a programmer-oriented survey of the Java platform’s architecture and internals. His popular columns in JavaWorld magazine covered Java internals, object-oriented design, and Jini. Bill is a community representative on the Scala Center advisory board, and is the lead developer and designer of the ScalaTest test framework and the Scalactic library for functional, object-oriented programming.

Frank Sommers is founder and president of Autospaces, Inc, a company providing workflow automation solutions to the financial services industry. Frank has been an active Scala user for over twelve years, and has worked with the language daily ever since.

Scala Glossary from the Book:

Glossary

algebraic data type A type defined by providing several alternatives, each of which comes with its own constructor. It usually comes with a way to decompose the type through pattern matching. The concept is found in specification languages and functional programming languages. Algebraic data types can be emulated in Scala with case classes.

alternative A branch of a match expression. It has the form “case pattern => expression.” Another name for alternative is case.

annotation An annotation appears in source code and is attached to some part of the syntax. Annotations are computer processable, so you can use them to effectively add an extension to Scala.

anonymous class An anonymous class is a synthetic subclass generated by the Scala compiler from a new expression in which the class or trait name is followed by curly braces. The curly braces contains the body of the anonymous subclass, which may be empty. However, if the name following new refers to a trait or class that contains abstract members, these must be made concrete inside the curly braces that define the body of the anonymous subclass.

anonymous function Another name for function literal.

apply You can apply a method, function, or closure to arguments, which means you invoke it on those arguments.

argument When a function is invoked, an argument is passed for each parameter of that function. The parameter is the variable that refers to the argument. The argument is the object passed at invocation time. In addition, applications can take (command line) arguments that show up in the Array[String] passed to main methods of singleton objects.

assign You can assign an object to a variable. Afterwards, the variable will refer to the object.

auxiliary constructor Extra constructors defined inside the curly braces of the class definition, which look like method definitions named this, but with no result type.

block One or more expressions and declarations surrounded by curly braces. When the block evaluates, all of its expressions and declarations are processed in order, and then the block returns the value of the last expression as its own value. Blocks are commonly used as the bodies of functions, for expressions, while loops, and any other place where you want to group a number of statements together. More formally, a block is an encapsulation construct for which you can only see side effects and a result value. The curly braces in which you define a class or object do not, therefore, form a block, because fields and methods (which are defined inside those curly braces) are visible from the outside. Such curly braces form a template.

bound variable A bound variable of an expression is a variable that’s both used and defined inside the expression. For instance, in the function literal expression (x: Int) => (x, y), both variables x and y are used, but only x is bound, because it is defined in the expression as an Int and the sole argument to the function described by the expression.

by-name parameter A parameter that is marked with a => in front of the parameter type, e.g., (x: => Int). The argument corresponding to a by-name parameter is evaluated not before the method is invoked, but each time the parameter is referenced by name inside the method. If a parameter is not by-name, it is by-value.

by-value parameter A parameter that is not marked with a => in front of the parameter type, e.g., (x: Int). The argument corresponding to a by-value parameter is evaluated before the method is invoked. By-value parameters contrast with by-name parameters.

class Defined with the class keyword, a class may either be abstract or concrete, and may be parameterized with types and values when instantiated. In “new ArrayString“, the class being instantiated is Array and the type of the value that results is Array[String]. A class that takes type parameters is called a type constructor. A type can be said to have a class as well, as in: the class of type Array[String] is Array.

closure A function object that captures free variables, and is said to be “closed” over the variables visible at the time it is created.

companion class A class that shares the same name with a singleton object defined in the same source file. The class is the singleton object’s companion class.

companion object A singleton object that shares the same name with a class defined in the same source file. Companion objects and classes have access to each other’s private members. In addition, any implicit conversions defined in the companion object will be in scope anywhere the class is used.

contravariant A contravariant annotation can be applied to a type parameter of a class or trait by putting a minus sign (-) before the type parameter. The class or trait then subtypes contravariantly with—in the opposite direction as—the type annotated parameter. For example, Function1 is contravariant in its first type parameter, and so Function1[Any, Any] is a subtype of Function1[String, Any].

covariant A covariant annotation can be applied to a type parameter of a class or trait by putting a plus sign (+) before the type parameter. The class or trait then subtypes covariantly with—in the same direction as—the type annotated parameter. For example, List is covariant in its type parameter, so List[String] is a subtype of List[Any].

currying A way to write functions with multiple parameter lists. For instance def f(x: Int)(y: Int) is a curried function with two parameter lists. A curried function is applied by passing several arguments lists, as in: f(3)(4). However, it is also possible to write a partial application of a curried function, such as f(3).

declare You can declare an abstract field, method, or type, which gives an entity a name but not an implementation. The key difference between declarations and definitions is that definitions establish an implementation for the named entity, declarations do not.

define To define something in a Scala program is to give it a name and an implementation. You can define classes, traits, singleton objects, fields, methods, local functions, local variables, etc. Because definitions always involve some kind of implementation, abstract members are declared not defined.

direct subclass A class is a direct subclass of its direct superclass.

direct superclass The class from which a class or trait is immediately derived, the nearest class above it in its inheritance hierarchy. If a class Parent is mentioned in a class Child’s optional extends clause, then Parent is the direct superclass of Child. If a trait is mentioned in Child’s extends clause, the trait’s direct superclass is the Child’s direct superclass. If Child has no extends clause, then AnyRef is the direct superclass of Child. If a class’s direct superclass takes type parameters, for example class Child extends Parent[String], the direct superclass of Child is still Parent, not Parent[String]. On the other hand, Parent[String] would be the direct supertype of Child. See supertype for more discussion of the distinction between class and type.

equality When used without qualification, equality is the relation between values expressed by `==’. See also reference equality.

expression Any bit of Scala code that yields a result. You can also say that an expression evaluates to a result or results in a value.

filter An if followed by a boolean expression in a for expression. In for(i <- 1 to 10; if i % 2 == 0), the filter is “if i % 2 == 0”. The value to the right of the if is the filter expression.

filter expression A filter expression is the boolean expression following an if in a for expression. In for(i <- 1 to 10; if i % 2 == 0), the filter expression is “i % 2 == 0”.

first-class function Scala supports first-class functions, which means you can express functions in function literal syntax, i.e., (x: Int) => x + 1, and that functions can be represented by objects, which are called function values.

for comprehension Another name for for expression.

free variable A free variable of an expression is a variable that’s used inside the expression but not defined inside the expression. For instance, in the function literal expression (x: Int) => (x, y), both variables x and y are used, but only y is a free variable, because it is not defined inside the expression.

function A function can be invoked with a list of arguments to produce a result. A function has a parameter list, a body, and a result type. Functions that are members of a class, trait, or singleton object are called methods. Functions defined inside other functions are called local functions. Functions with the result type of Unit are called procedures. Anonymous functions in source code are called function literals. At run time, function literals are instantiated into objects called function values.

function literal A function with no name in Scala source code, specified with function literal syntax. For example, (x: Int, y: Int) => x + y.

function value A function object that can be invoked just like any other function. A function value’s class extends one of the FunctionN traits (e.g., Function0, Function1) from package scala, and is usually expressed in source code via function literal syntax. A function value is “invoked” when its apply method is called. A function value that captures free variables is a closure.

functional style The functional style of programming emphasizes functions and evaluation results and deemphasizes the order in which operations occur. The style is characterized by passing function values into looping methods, immutable data, methods with no side effects. It is the dominant paradigm of languages such as Haskell and Erlang, and contrasts with the imperative style.

generator A generator defines a named val and assigns to it a series of values in a for expression. For example, in for(i <- 1 to 10), the generator is “i <- 1 to 10”. The value to the right of the <- is the generator expression.

generator expression A generator expression generates a series of values in a for expression. For example, in for(i <- 1 to 10), the generator expression is “1 to 10”.

generic class A class that takes type parameters. For example, because scala.List takes a type parameter, scala.List is a generic class.

generic trait A trait that takes type parameters. For example, because trait scala.collection.Set takes a type parameter, it is a generic trait.

helper function A function whose purpose is to provide a service to one or more other functions nearby. Helper functions are often implemented as local functions.

helper method A helper function that’s a member of a class. Helper methods are often private.

immutable An object is immutable if its value cannot be changed after it is created in any way visible to clients. Objects may or may not be immutable.

imperative style The imperative style of programming emphasizes careful sequencing of operations so that their effects happen in the right order. The style is characterized by iteration with loops, mutating data in place, and methods with side effects. It is the dominant paradigm of languages such as C, C++, C# and Java, and contrasts with the functional style.

initialize When a variable is defined in Scala source code, you must initialize it with an object.

instance An instance, or class instance, is an object, a concept that exists only at run time.

instantiate To instantiate a class is to make a new object from the class, an action that happens only at run time.

invariant Invariant is used in two ways. It can mean a property that always holds true when a data structure is well-formed. For example, it is an invariant of a sorted binary tree that each node is ordered before its right subnode, if it has a right subnode. Invariant is also sometimes used as a synonym for nonvariant: “class Array is invariant in its type parameter.”

invoke You can invoke a method, function, or closure on arguments, meaning its body will be executed with the specified arguments.

JVM The JVM is the Java Virtual Machine, or runtime, that hosts a running Scala program.

literal 1, “One”, and (x: Int) => x + 1 are examples of literals. A literal is a shorthand way to describe an object, where the shorthand exactly mirrors the structure of the created object.

local function A local function is a def defined inside a block. To contrast, a def defined as a member of a class, trait, or singleton object is called a method.

local variable A local variable is a val or var defined inside a block. Although similar to local variables, parameters to functions are not referred to as local variables, but simply as parameters or “variables” without the “local.”

member A member is any named element of the template of a class, trait, or singleton object. A member may be accessed with the name of its owner, a dot, and its simple name. For example, top-level fields and methods defined in a class are members of that class. A trait defined inside a class is a member of its enclosing class. A type defined with the type keyword in a class is a member of that class. A class is a member of the package in which is it defined. By contrast, a local variable or local function is not a member of its surrounding block.

meta-programming Meta-programming software is software whose input is itself software. Compilers are meta-programs, as are tools like scaladoc. Meta-programming software is required in order to do anything with an annotation.

method A method is a function that is a member of some class, trait, or singleton object.

mixin Mixin is what a trait is called when it is being used in a mixin composition. In other words, in “trait Hat,” Hat is just a trait, but in “new Cat extends AnyRef with Hat,” Hat can be called a mixin. When used as a verb, “mix in” is two words. For example, you can mix traits into classes or other traits.

mixin composition The process of mixing traits into classes or other traits. Mixin composition differs from traditional multiple inheritance in that the type of the super reference is not known at the point the trait is defined, but rather is determined anew each time the trait is mixed into a class or other trait.

modifier A keyword that qualifies a class, trait, field, or method definition in some way. For example, the private modifier indicates that a class, trait, field, or method being defined is private.

multiple definitions The same expression can be assigned in multiple definitions if you use the syntax val v1, v2, v3 = exp.

nonvariant A type parameter of a class or trait is by default nonvariant. The class or trait then does not subtype when that parameter changes. For example, because class Array is nonvariant in its type parameter, Array[String] is neither a subtype nor a supertype of Array[Any].

operation In Scala, every operation is a method call. Methods may be invoked in operator notation, such as b + 2, and when in that notation, + is an operator.

parameter Functions may take zero to many parameters. Each parameter has a name and a type. The distinction between parameters and arguments is that arguments refer to the actual objects passed when a function is invoked. Parameters are the variables that refer to those passed arguments.

parameterless function A function that takes no parameters, which is defined without any empty parentheses. Invocations of parameterless functions may not supply parentheses. This supports the uniform access principle, which enables the def to be changed into a val without requiring a change to client code.

parameterless method A parameterless method is a parameterless function that is a member of a class, trait, or singleton object.

parametric field A field defined as a class parameter.

partially applied function A function that’s used in an expression and that misses some of its arguments. For instance, if function f has type Int => Int => Int, then f and f(1) are partially applied functions.

path-dependent type A type like swiss.cow.Food. The swiss.cow part is a path that forms a reference to an object. The meaning of the type is sensitive to the path you use to access it. The types swiss.cow.Food and fish.Food, for example, are different types.

pattern In a match expression alternative, a pattern follows each case keyword and precedes either a pattern guard or the => symbol.

pattern guard In a match expression alternative, a pattern guard can follow a pattern. For example, in “case x if x % 2 == 0 => x + 1”, the pattern guard is “if x % 2 == 0”. A case with a pattern guard will only be selected if the pattern matches and the pattern guard yields true.

predicate A predicate is a function with a Boolean result type.

primary constructor The main constructor of a class, which invokes a superclass constructor, if necessary, initializes fields to passed values, and executes any top-level code defined between the curly braces of the class. Fields are initialized only for value parameters not passed to the superclass constructor, except for any that are not used in the body of the class and can therefore be optimized away.

procedure A procedure is a function with result type of Unit, which is therefore executed solely for its side effects.

reassignable A variable may or may not be reassignable. A var is reassignable while a val is not.

receiver The receiver of a method call is the variable, expression, or object on which the method is invoked.

recursive A function is recursive if it calls itself. If the only place the function calls itself is the last expression of the function, then the function is tail recursive.

reference A reference is the Java abstraction of a pointer, which uniquely identifies an object that resides on the JVM’s heap. Reference type variables hold references to objects, because reference types (instances of AnyRef) are implemented as Java objects that reside on the JVM’s heap. Value type variables, by contrast, may sometimes hold a reference (to a boxed wrapper type) and sometimes not (when the object is being represented as a primitive value). Speaking generally, a Scala variable refers to an object. The term “refers” is more abstract than “holds a reference.” If a variable of type scala.Int is currently represented as a primitive Java int value, then that variable still refers to the Int object, but no reference is involved.

reference equality Reference equality means that two references identify the very same Java object. Reference equality can be determined, for reference types only, by calling eq in AnyRef. (In Java programs, reference equality can be determined using == on Java reference types.)

reference type A reference type is a subclass of AnyRef. Instances of reference types always reside on the JVM’s heap at run time.

referential transparency A property of functions that are independent of temporal context and have no side effects. For a particular input, an invocation of a referentially transparent function can be replaced by its result without changing the program semantics.

refers A variable in a running Scala program always refers to some object. Even if that variable is assigned to null, it conceptually refers to the Null object. At runtime, an object may be implemented by a Java object or a value of a primitive type, but Scala allows programmers to think at a higher level of abstraction about their code as they imagine it running. See also reference.

refinement type A type formed by supplying a base type a number of members inside curly braces. The members in the curly braces refine the types that are present in the base type. For example, the type of “animal that eats grass” is Animal { type SuitableFood = Grass }.

result An expression in a Scala program yields a result. The result of every expression in Scala is an object.

result type A method’s result type is the type of the value that results from calling the method. (In Java, this concept is called the return type.)

return A function in a Scala program returns a value. You can call this value the result of the function. You can also say the function results in the value. The result of every function in Scala is an object.

runtime The Java Virtual Machine, or JVM, that hosts a running Scala program. Runtime encompasses both the virtual machine, as defined by the Java Virtual Machine Specification, and the runtime libraries of the Java API and the standard Scala API. The phrase at run time (with a space between run and time) means when the program is running, and contrasts with compile time.

runtime type The type of an object at run time. To contrast, a static type is the type of an expression at compile time. Most runtime types are simply bare classes with no type parameters. For example, the runtime type of “Hi” is String, and the runtime type of (x: Int) => x + 1 is Function1. Runtime types can be tested with isInstanceOf.

script A file containing top level definitions and statements, which can be run directly with scala without explicitly compiling. A script must end in an expression, not a definition.

selector The value being matched on in a match expression. For example, in “s match { case _ => }”, the selector is s.

self type A self type of a trait is the assumed type of this, the receiver, to be used within the trait. Any concrete class that mixes in the trait must ensure that its type conforms to the trait’s self type. The most common use of self types is for dividing a large class into several traits as described in Chapter 32.

semi-structured data XML data is semi-structured. It is more structured than a flat binary file or text file, but it does not have the full structure of a programming language’s data structures.

serialization You can serialize an object into a byte stream which can then be saved to files or transmitted over the network. You can later deserialize the byte stream, even on different computer, and obtain an object that is the same as the original serialized object.

shadow A new declaration of a local variable shadows one of the same name in an enclosing scope.

signature Signature is short for type signature.

singleton object An object defined with the object keyword. Each singleton object has one and only one instance. A singleton object that shares its name with a class, and is defined in the same source file as that class, is that class’s companion object. The class is its companion class. A singleton object that doesn’t have a companion class is a standalone object.

standalone object A singleton object that has no companion class.

statement An expression, definition, or import, i.e., things that can go into a template or a block in Scala source code.

static type See type.

subclass A class is a subclass of all of its superclasses and supertraits.

subtrait A trait is a subtrait of all of its supertraits.

subtype The Scala compiler will allow any of a type’s subtypes to be used as a substitute wherever that type is required. For classes and traits that take no type parameters, the subtype relationship mirrors the subclass relationship. For example, if class Cat is a subclass of abstract class Animal, and neither takes type parameters, type Cat is a subtype of type Animal. Likewise, if trait Apple is a subtrait of trait Fruit, and neither takes type parameters, type Apple is a subtype of type Fruit. For classes and traits that take type parameters, however, variance comes into play. For example, because abstract class List is declared to be covariant in its lone type parameter (i.e., List is declared List[+A]), List[Cat] is a subtype of List[Animal], and List[Apple] a subtype of List[Fruit]. These subtype relationships exist even though the class of each of these types is List. By contrast, because Set is not declared to be covariant in its type parameter (i.e., Set is declared Set[A] with no plus sign), Set[Cat] is not a subtype of Set[Animal]. A subtype should correctly implement the contracts of its supertypes, so that the Liskov Substitution Principle applies, but the compiler only verifies this property at the level of type checking.

superclass A class’s superclasses include its direct superclass, its direct superclass’s direct superclass, and so on, all the way up to Any.

supertrait A class’s or trait’s supertraits, if any, include all traits directly mixed into the class or trait or any of its superclasses, plus any supertraits of those traits.

supertype A type is a supertype of all of its subtypes.

synthetic class A synthetic class is generated automatically by the compiler rather than being written by hand by the programmer.

tail recursive A function is tail recursive if the only place the function calls itself is the last operation of the function.

target typing Target typing is a form of type inference that takes into account the type that’s expected. In nums.filter((x) => x > 0), for example, the Scala compiler infers type of x to be the element type of nums, because the filter method invokes the function on each element of nums.

template A template is the body of a class, trait, or singleton object definition. It defines the type signature, behavior, and initial state of the class, trait, or object.

trait A trait, which is defined with the trait keyword, is like an abstract class that cannot take any value parameters and can be “mixed into” classes or other traits via the process known as mixin composition. When a trait is being mixed into a class or trait, it is called a mixin. A trait may be parameterized with one or more types. When parameterized with types, the trait constructs a type. For example, Set is a trait that takes a single type parameter, whereas Set[Int] is a type. Also, Set is said to be “the trait of” type Set[Int].

type Every variable and expression in a Scala program has a type that is known at compile time. A type restricts the possible values to which a variable can refer, or an expression can produce, at run time. A variable or expression’s type can also be referred to as a static type if necessary to differentiate it from an object’s runtime type. In other words, “type” by itself means static type. Type is distinct from class because a class that takes type parameters can construct many types. For example, List is a class, but not a type. List[T] is a type with a free type parameter. List[Int] and List[String] are also types (called ground types because they have no free type parameters). A type can have a “class” or “trait.” For example, the class of type List[Int] is List. The trait of type Set[String] is Set.

type constraint Some annotations are type constraints, meaning that they add additional limits, or constraints, on what values the type includes. For example, @positive could be a type constraint on the type Int, limiting the type of 32-bit integers down to those that are positive. Type constraints are not checked by the standard Scala compiler, but must instead be checked by an extra tool or by a compiler plugin.

type constructor A class or trait that takes type parameters.

type parameter A parameter to a generic class or generic method that must be filled in by a type. For example, class List is defined as “class List[T] { …”, and method identity, a member of object Predef, is defined as “def identityT = x”. The T in both cases is a type parameter.

type signature A method’s type signature comprises its name, the number, order, and types of its parameters, if any, and its result type. The type signature of a class, trait, or singleton object comprises its name, the type signatures of all of its members and constructors, and its declared inheritance and mixin relations.

uniform access principle The uniform access principle states that variables and parameterless functions should be accessed using the same syntax. Scala supports this principle by not allowing parentheses to be placed at call sites of parameterless functions. As a result, a parameterless function definition can be changed to a val, or vice versa, without affecting client code.

unreachable At the Scala level, objects can become unreachable, at which point the memory they occupy may be reclaimed by the runtime. Unreachable does not necessarily mean unreferenced. Reference types (instances of AnyRef) are implemented as objects that reside on the JVM’s heap. When an instance of a reference type becomes unreachable, it indeed becomes unreferenced, and is available for garbage collection. Value types (instances of AnyVal) are implemented as both primitive type values and as instances of Java wrapper types (such as java.lang.Integer), which reside on the heap. Value type instances can be boxed (converted from a primitive value to a wrapper object) and unboxed (converted from a wrapper object to a primitive value) throughout the lifetime of the variables that refer to them. If a value type instance currently represented as a wrapper object on the JVM’s heap becomes unreachable, it indeed becomes unreferenced, and is available for garbage collection. But if a value type currently represented as a primitive value becomes unreachable, then it does not become unreferenced, because it does not exist as an object on the JVM’s heap at that point in time. The runtime may reclaim memory occupied by unreachable objects, but if an Int, for example, is implemented at run time by a primitive Java int that occupies some memory in the stack frame of an executing method, then the memory for that object is “reclaimed” when the stack frame is popped as the method completes. Memory for reference types, such as Strings, may be reclaimed by the JVM’s garbage collector after they become unreachable.

unreferenced See unreachable.

value The result of any computation or expression in Scala is a value, and in Scala, every value is an object. The term value essentially means the image of an object in memory (on the JVM’s heap or stack).

value type A value type is any subclass of AnyVal, such as Int, Double, or Unit. This term has meaning at the level of Scala source code. At runtime, instances of value types that correspond to Java primitive types may be implemented in terms of primitive type values or instances of wrapper types, such as java.lang.Integer. Over the lifetime of a value type instance, the runtime may transform it back and forth between primitive and wrapper types (i.e., to box and unbox it).

variable A named entity that refers to an object. A variable is either a val or a var. Both vals and vars must be initialized when defined, but only vars can be later reassigned to refer to a different object.

variance A type parameter of a class or trait can be marked with a variance annotation, either covariant (+) or contravariant (-). Such variance annotations indicate how subtyping works for a generic class or trait. For example, the generic class List is covariant in its type parameter, and thus List[String] is a subtype of List[Any]. By default, i.e., absent a + or – annotation, type parameters are nonvariant.

wildcard type A wildcard type includes references to type variables that are unknown. For example, Array[_] is a wildcard type. It is an array where the element type is completely unknown.

yield An expression can yield a result. The yield keyword designates the result of a for expression.